← All ideas
Reference-ledCivic accountability4 connected sources

Cross-source hypothesis

Officially Invisible Facility

Why do public systems disagree about whether this facility exists?

Compare education registries, national geospatial reference data, and OpenStreetMap, then turn contradictions into a correction packet.

01

Why this pairing matters

The non-obvious connection

A school or kindergarten can have different names, locations, or existence states across official and collaborative systems. The mismatch itself is actionable civic data.

02

The demonstration

One visible reveal

One location receives three conflicting public answers; the user can inspect each record and export a source-linked human verification checklist.
03

Three-hour boundary

The smallest credible version

Five curated discrepancies, side-by-side source records, one map, and a copyable correction packet. No automated source-of-truth verdict.

04

Claim boundary

What the data cannot establish

A missing or mismatched record may reflect update cadence, naming, geocoding, or actual closure. It needs human verification.

05

Underlying evidence

Open every connected source

PeriodicLive-tested

Education

EMIS schools

Education Management Information System (EMIS), Ministry of Education, Science and Youth of GeorgiaInspect fields and samples →
Static referenceLive-tested

Geospatial reference

NSDI social POI

National Agency of Public Registry (NAPR), National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI)Inspect fields and samples →
06

Shared ingredients

Related combinations